The reading assignment below comes from “Church History in Plain Language” by Bruce L. Shelley.
[responsivevoice_button]
In an English village, late in the eighteenth century, stood a humble workshop. Over its door, a sign announced, “Secondhand shoes bought and sold.” Inside, the shoemaker, William Carey, repaired a neighbor’s boot or, when time allowed, continued his study of Latin and Greek. Over the workbench was a crude map of the world. On it, Carey had penned bits of information from the voyages of Captain James Cook or some other world traveler. A friend, Thomas Scott, called the workshop: “Carey’s College.”
Carey’s workbench and map are fit symbols of the awakening interest in distant peoples during the Age of Progress and in the means of getting the gospel to them. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Protestant Christianity scarcely existed outside Europe and America. Asia was almost untouched by the gospel, except for small traces in India and in the East Indies where the Dutch had taken over from the Portuguese. Africa was the “dark continent” except for the ancient Copts in Egypt and Ethiopia. After eighteen centuries Christianity was far from being a world religion.
It is a different story today. The front page of almost any metropolitan newspaper carries news, daily, of events vitally linked with Christianity somewhere on the earth.
The great era of Christian expansion was the nineteenth century. “Never had any other set of ideas, religious or secular, been propagated over so wide an area by so many professional agents maintained by the unconstrained donations of so many millions of individuals.” That is the informed judgment of Kenneth Scott Latourette, the foremost historian of Christianity’s expansion. For sheer magnitude, the Christian mission in the nineteenth century is without parallel in human history.
How do we explain this sudden explosion of Protestant energy armed at winning the world for Christ?
PIONEER OF MODERN MISSIONS
During the first century of Protestant history, the Roman Catholic countries, Spain and Portugal, dominated the commercial and imperial expansion of European peoples. The great missionary names were Xavier, Las Casas, and Ricci. Only after the English defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 and the emergence of the British and Dutch as colonial powers do new continents and peoples open to Protestant missionaries.
The first Protestants to attempt to reach distant peoples with the gospel were the Pietists. Moravian concern, however, was focused on individuals in some European colony, perishing without the knowledge of Christ. The Christian groups created by Pietists were tiny islands in the surrounding sea of “heathenism.”
William Carey introduced Christians to missions on a grander scale. He thought in terms of the evangelization of whole countries, and of what happens when whole populations become Christian. He held that the foreign missionary can never make more than a small contribution to the accomplishment of the work that has to be done, and that therefore the development of the local ministry is the first and greatest of all missionary considerations. Above all, he saw that Christianity must be firmly rooted in the culture and traditions of the land in which it is planted. For all these reasons and more Carey gained the title, “Father of Modern Missions.”
The English cobbler was a most unlikely candidate for greatness. He was married to a girl who fell victim to mental illness, and what Carey earned as a shoemaker was often too little to provide enough to eat. Yet the greatness of the man was within, not in his circumstances. He had a ravenous hunger for knowledge and would go without food to buy a book. Columbus and Captain James Cook were his great heroes.
In 1779, through a fellow shoemaker, he was converted to faith in Christ, and in 1783 he was baptized as a believer. After gaining some preaching experience, he became pastor of the Moulton Baptist Chapel, supporting his family by teaching and shoemaking.
Carey through the study of the scriptures came to realize that, if it is the duty of all men to repent and believe the gospel, then it is also the duty of those entrusted with the gospel to carry it to the whole world.
In 1792, Carey published An Inquiry into the Obligation of Christians to Use Means for the Conversion of the Heathen. It created an epoch. In it, Carey took up the five objections that people raised against missions to “heathen” lands: their distance, their barbarism, the danger that would be incurred, the difficulties of support, and the unintelligible languages. One by one he answered these.
The same obstacles had not prevented the merchants from going to distant shores. “It only requires,” he wrote, “that we should have as much love to the souls of our fellow-creatures, and fellow sinners, as they have for the profits arising from a few otter skins, and all these difficulties could be easily surmounted.” He ended his appeal with practical proposals for the preaching of the gospel throughout the world.
By encouraging each other Carey and Fuller succeeded in breaking free from the restrictive theology of their time. They went back to the New Testament, especially to Jesus’ injunction to preach the gospel to all the world, and to the apostle Paul’s declaration of God’s intention: “that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father” (Philippians 2:10, 11).
As a result, in October 1792, Carey, Fuller, and eleven Baptist colleagues formed the Baptist Missionary Society, and within a year Carey and his family were on their way to India.
The British East India Company, which had been the virtual ruler of India since 1763, was exercising its full power at that time. It was not enthusiastic about missions. Its interest was in profits. Most of its representatives, living free and easy lives and enjoying to the full their sense of racial superiority, considered “the sending out of missionaries into our Eastern possessions to be the maddest, most extravagant, most costly, most indefensible project which has ever been suggested by a moonstruck fanatic. Such a scheme is pernicious, imprudent, useless, harmful, dangerous, profitless, fantastic.”
The Company refused Carey permission to live in Calcutta, so he settled instead in Serampore, under the Danish flag. He secured employment as foreman of an indigo factory in Bengal. Since the position demanded only three months of the year, he found plenty of time for intensive study of the oriental languages. In 1799, two fellow Baptists, Joshua Marshman and William Ward, joined Carey at Serampore. For the next quarter-century the three men worked together to organize a growing network of mission stations in and beyond Bengal.
Carey and his companions plunged courageously into all the intricacies of Hindu thought. They did not regard these studies as in any way a distraction from their missionary work. On the contrary, they regarded a full understanding of Hindu thought as an essential part of their equipment, not only because the preacher of the gospel cannot be clearly understood if he speaks merely out of the self-confidence of his own knowledge, but also because they understood that it is not only the souls and bodies of men that need to be redeemed – the thought-world of a non-Christian nation is also one of those realms that are to be taken captive and brought into subjection to Christ. By 1824, Carey had supervised six complete and twenty-four partial translations of the Bible as well as publishing several grammars, dictionaries, and translations of Eastern books.
THE CONTAGION OF MISSIONARY SERVICE
The example of the Serampore trio proved contagious. The beginning of the nineteenth century found a new and pervasive determination in Protestantism to carry the gospel to all men. The earlier prevailing attitude of the major churches had considered missions an unnecessary and hopeless undertaking. Now voices were raised on all sides proclaiming the duty of all Christians to share in the conversion of the peoples of the whole world. The gospel was not the private possession of European peoples.
The list of missionary pioneers would run into the hundreds: Henry Martyn in India, Robert Morrison in China, John Williams in the South Seas, Adoniram Judson in Burma, Alexander Duff in India, Allen Gardiner on Tierra del Fuego, Robert Moffat in South Africa, and many more. Scores of other missionaries and their wives are long forgotten because they died in a matter of months in some malaria-infested tropical climate or at the hands of some savage tribe.
In large part this new passion to preach the gospel to the “heathen” sprang from those portions of Protestantism deeply influenced by the eighteenth-century evangelical revivals in England and America. For the first three decades of the new missionary era the endeavor was almost exclusively evangelical.
This is hardly surprising. The evangelical awakenings revolutionized preaching and its objectives. Traditional churchmen usually limited the minister’s task to nurturing the seed of faith planted at baptism in virtually all members of the parish. Such men could not imagine preaching the gospel in a tribal society. At the same time, those Christians who held to a rigid doctrine of predestination never seemed to concern themselves with the elect in India or China. Evangelicals, however, like Carey, saw preaching as calling sinners to God through faith in Christ. They felt a personal responsibility to do this, and saw no difference in principle between “baptized heathen” in Britain and non-Christian peoples overseas.
Only in the 1820s and 1830s did interest in overseas missions become a general feature of British church life. This was due in part to the success of evangelicals in inuencing English and Scottish society. Many of their values were adopted outside their circle. In particular, the idea off Britain as a Christian nation, with Christian responsibilities overseas, took root.
Two emphases led to this new Protestant world vision. One, as Carey and Fuller illustrate, was evangelical. The Bible teaches that men are lost without faith in Christ, and the Lord commands believers in every age to make salvation known in all the world.
The other was prophetic. Many Christians in the nineteenth century followed Jonathan Edwards in the belief that the knowledge of the Lord would fill the earth as the waters cover the sea, and this spread of the gospel was preparation for the coming reign of Christ upon the earth. This belief in a future reign of Christ was called Post-millennialism.
The Protestant mission to all the world was no empty dream. The dedication of the missionary movement blended with the optimism of the Age of Progress to make the achievement of the goal seem quite possible. Thus, the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions took as its watchword, “the evangelization of the world in this generation.”
The vision was constantly renewed by some fresh accounts from Africa or the South Pacific. None of these proved more inspiring than the reports of the spiritual darkness of Africa or the horrors of the Arab slave trade sent home by David Livingstone (1813-1873).
The great explorer of “the dark continent”. came from a hardy clan of Scotsmen. When he was nineteen, he determined to devote his life to the “alleviation of human misery.” He studied as a doctor to prepare himself for the work of a missionary, and, attracted by the fame of Robert Moffat in South Africa, he went to Africa to help in the work.
LIVINGSTONE IN AFRICA
Arriving in 1841, Livingstone served for ten years in the ordinary routine of missionary work. But he was not a man to stay long in any one place. The mind and impulse of the explorer were in him, and he was always drawn on, in his own words, by “the smoke of a thousand villages” that had never seen a missionary.
The first great journey that made him famous led him through the jungles to the west coast in Angola, and then because he would not desert the African carriers who had accompanied him-right across the continent to Quilimane on the east coast. On this journey, he showed all the qualities of a great explorer. His manner with the Africans was so patient that he
never had to use violence. And his scientific and geographical observations were minutely accurate. This one trip opened the heart of Africa to the modern age.
But Livingstone was at all times more than a traveler. His cause was the gospel. His journal abounds in passages of almost mystical devotion. Shortly before setting out on his great journey he wrote: “I place no value on anything I have or may possess, except in relation to the kingdom of Christ.”
What moved him more than anything else was what he called “this open sore of the world “- the devastating slave trade of central Africa. Speaking to the students at Cambridge in 1857, he said: “I go back to Africa to try to make an open path for commerce and Christianity: do your best to carry out the work which I have begun, I leave it to you.”
Commerce and Christianity? Was Livingstone simply a forerunner of those colonialist exploiters who made life in so many parts of Africa a nightmare? No, far from it. Livingstone realized that the slave trade could not continue apart from the African’s own participation in it. When slave-raiding was the way to wealth, the temptation was always present to engage in those raids on weaker neighboring tribes that made life perilous for the defenseless. Only if the Africans could be persuaded to engage in legitimate commerce, exchanging the products of their own fields and forests for those desirable things the white man could supply, would the evil and destructive commerce be brought to an end. That, at any rate, was Livingstone’s conviction, a central part of his dream for Africa.
How was this missionary vision turned to action? What were the channels for this burst of spiritual energy? The traditional denominations used one of three forms of church government: episcopal, presbyterian, or congregational. The supporters of each claimed to be following the Bible, and all the main arguments on each side were well-known. Men had suffered – some even shed blood – for each form of government.
But as the conviction of the responsibility to spread the gospel worldwide began to dawn on British and American Christians it became clear that none of the traditional forms of church government would enable the church to embark on a world mission. Supporters of global evangelism were driven to find another form of cooperation: the voluntary society.
CREATION OF THE VOLUNTARY SOCIETY
Again, Carey proved the pioneer. When he wrote his Enquiry he asked: what would a trading company do? From this, he proposed the formation of a company of serious-minded Christians, laymen and ministers. The group should have a committee to collect and sift information, and to find funds and suitable missionaries to send to foreign lands.
The voluntary society, of which the missionary society was one early form, transformed nineteenth-century Christianity. It was invented to meet a need rather than for theological reasons, but in effect, it undermined the established forms of church government. It made possible inter-denominational action. Anglican, Baptist, Congregationalist, and Methodist could work together for defined purposes without raising troublesome questions of church structure. It also altered the power base in the church by encouraging lay leadership. Ordinary Christian men, and later women, came to hold key positions in the important societies, something thought impossible elsewhere in the church.
These features appeared early in the history of missionary societies. The London Missionary Society adopted in 1795, its “fundamental principle that our design is not to send Presbyterianism, Independency, Episcopacy or any other form of church government … but the glorious gospel of the blessed God to the heathen.” One of the founders called for “the funeral of bigotry.”
Thanks to the creation of the societies, the missionary enthusiast who collected a penny a week from members of his local missionary society auxiliary, and distributed the missionary magazine, participated fully in the work of missions. Through the labors of such people, candidates for service often came forward. The American missionary, Rufus Anderson, wrote in 1834: “It was not until the present century that the evangelical churches of Christendom were ever really organized with a view to the conversion of the world.” They became organized by means of the voluntary society.
In the United States, the first foreign missionary society was the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (1810). It was formed on the initiative of a group of students at the newly created Congregational Andover Theological Seminary. The leader of the group was Samuel J. Mills, who while at Williams College had instigated the formation of a small society in which each member pledged to devote his life to missionary service. At Andover, the society included the later famous missionary to Burma, Adoniram Judson. Students, then, as so many times in later years, laid the foundation for a missionary advance, this one for the youthful American nation.
In a few years Baptists, Presbyterians, and other major denominations followed the Congregationalists in creating missionary agencies. The conversion of the “heathen” became one of the major concerns of local
congregations in every city and town in the country, stimulated by the continuous activity of local societies and women’s organizations, “children’s days for foreign missions,” occasional visits from missionaries on furlough, periodical campaigns for offerings, and, more recently, the inclusion of support of foreign missions as a large item in regular church budgets.
By the end of the nineteenth century, almost every Christian body, from the Orthodox Church of Russia to the Salvation Army, and almost every country, from the Lutheran Church of Finland and the Waldensian Church of ltaly, to the newest denomination in the United States, had its share in the missionary enterprise overseas.
Many times these early missionaries were unaware of the conflicts that the gospel produced in other cultures. To most of them, Christianity in its Western form was Christianity. Therefore to make an Indian or a Malaysian a Christian was in great measure to turn him into a Dutchman or a Portuguese.
It is easy today to condemn this attitude. Yet every Christian Society, and every individual Christian, combined with the faith much that is cultural tradition. The problem has pursued all missionary work from the beginning. Nevertheless, the consequences of such an alien presentation can be disastrous to the progress of the gospel. If Christianity appears in Western habits that other people find shocking, such as the eating of meat, or a greater familiarity between the sexes than is permitted in most Eastern societies, then the faith is condemned before it is even examined.
On the other hand, there is a distinctiveness of the Christian Community that arises from the distinctiveness of the Gospel itself. The Gospel is a revolutionary power and any attempt to disguise this fact is likely to change the Christian faith into something else.
The depth of this problem helps explain why Christianity to this day in those regions dominated by ancient cultures – Islamic, Hindu, and Chinese – is still a minority, in some areas a meager minority.
THE MARKS OF MODERN CHRISTIANITY
In spite of all barriers, however, the Protestant missionary movement continued to expand. In the process it highlighted several characteristics of modern Christianity:
First, the worldwide expansion usually came by voluntaryism not by compulsion. Since the time of Constantine the propagation of the faith had had the active support of rulers in Christian countries and often resulted in mass conversions. That was generally true of Roman Catholic missions in the seventeenth century throughout Asia and Latin America. Protestant missionaries in the nineteenth century, however, went, with few exceptions, without state support or state control. They advanced only by the power of persuasion. Thus, Christians found a way to engage in missions while upholding religious freedom.
Second, this missionary movement tapped the wealth and talents of rank and file Protestants. Unlike earlier missionary expansion led by monks and bishops, the new societies were organized on the widest base possible. So the primary task of the churches, preaching the gospel, fell upon the people of the churches.
Third, a wide variety of humanitarian ministries accompanied the widespread preaching of the gospel. Mission agencies established schools, hospitals, and centers for training nurses and doctors. They reduced many languages and dialects to writing and translated not only the Bible but other Western writings into these languages. And they introduced public health measures and better agricultural techniques. In some cases these activities were closely related to the goal of conversion, but many sprang simply out of the recognition of social and physical needs that no Christian could in good conscience ignore.
In many respects, then, the missionary movement restored the gospel to its central place in Christianity. And in this important sense, the movement recovered an element in the concept of the holy catholic church that the Reformation had obscured. A catholicity, that began on Carey’s workshop map, reached out to embrace new peoples in many new lands.
William Carey’s famous quote is, “Expect great things from God. Attempt great things for God.” What does this mean to you? Put it in your own words.
I can trust that he will provide what I need and he will take horrible things (like my dad and the divorce) and make something great (Mom got divorced but then God gave us San). And while we are waiting for God, we can do great things for him like minister to people and care for them.
I think that it means that we should expect God to do great things and that we should attempt to do great things for the glory of God.
I think it means that God will always t great things and help us and we should do what he says and try to do what he wants.
i think it means that we should expect God to do amazing things, but that doesnt mean we cant do amazing things too for God.
i think that it means that God has power over all and even if it looks like its falling apart God still has his hand on it.
I think it means that we should expect god to do amazing things but we cant really do the same for him.
Why do you think that we can’t do amazing things. Jesus told his disciples that they would do more amazing things than he did.
I really thought the church had always considered the gospel primary. Well, guess not. I find it interesting that it only takes a person of low status to do great things. But that is true. William Carey was only a shoemaker, but knew enough about Christianity to be a missionary and became of one of them. I think that both Carey and Livingstone helped bring the gospel front and center and they did a good job doing it.
It’s funny, he was a shoemaker, but while he was making shoes he was becoming fluent in like 5 languages.
I think it means that God will do great things for us and we should try too also
i think i mean we should obey God and he will do good thing
i think it means that god is powerful and does great things
I think it means God does amazing powerful things and we should be able to do the same for him